An individual should not be placed in confinement when the confinement is based solely on impending administrative discharge proceedings.

An individual should not be placed in confinement when the confinement is based solely on impending administrative discharge proceedings.

• A. Based solely on impending administrative discharge proceedings
• B. Based solely on personal opinion
• C. Based solely on rumor
• D. Based solely on administrative errors

Answer: (A)

Confinement should be based on actual safety, security, or order concerns, not on pending administrative actions. Placing someone in confinement solely because an administrative discharge is forthcoming uses confinement as a punitive lever before a formal determination has been made, which risks violating due process and undermines fairness. There must be a real, demonstrable reason—such as a credible risk to safety or a need to preserve the integrity of an investigation—to justify confinement. Personal opinion, rumors, or administrative errors do not provide the credible basis required for confinement, and thus cannot justify it. Pending discharge alone does not show misconduct or a current risk, so it isn’t a proper sole basis for confinement.

Confinement should be based on actual safety, security, or order concerns, not on pending administrative actions. Placing someone in confinement solely because an administrative discharge is forthcoming uses confinement as a punitive lever before a formal determination has been made, which risks violating due process and undermines fairness. There must be a real, demonstrable reason—such as a credible risk to safety or a need to preserve the integrity of an investigation—to justify confinement.

Personal opinion, rumors, or administrative errors do not provide the credible basis required for confinement, and thus cannot justify it. Pending discharge alone does not show misconduct or a current risk, so it isn’t a proper sole basis for confinement.